Douglas - Joe trial - Charley Doyel - Montgomery InGenWeb Project

Go to content

Douglas - Joe trial - Charley Doyel

Source: Crawfordsville Weekly Journal Friday, 4 January 1901
Mayor Elmore has set this morning at 9 o’clock as the hour for a preliminary hearing in the case of Joe Douglas, charged with assault with intent to commit murder. Witnesses for the defense and state were summoned yesterday afternoon, but it is in no wise a sure thing that they will testify today. It is generally thought that the state will ask a continuance, owing to the condition of Charles Doyle. Doyle is steadily losing ground and practically no hope is entertained of his recovery. He is weak and suffers greatly.  He believes that he will not recover, and believing this, reasserts that the story of the affair as given to Coroner Dennis is correct. (Note first picture is Charley Doyle; second Joe Douglas)



Parrish continues to improve and his features are now in such a condition that it can be seen that the charge of shot struck on the right side of his face, indicating that he was passing the window going west and was not looking in when shot. He has begun to appreciate the fact that he is blind and laments in a pitiful manner. He prays that at least one eye be spared him.



Source: Crawfordsville Weekly Journal Friday, 17 May 1901


 
Joe Douglas, charged with the murder of Charley Doyle, is a free man. The jury found that he acted in self defense when he fired and lost no time in finding a verdict in his favor.
After the jury visited the scene of the shooting last Friday they returned to the court room and the arguments were at once begun. Mr. McBroom spoke for the state and was followed by Mr. Swank for the defense. Both men made excellent speeches and brought out the strong points of their respective cases with great force. Court adjourned upon the conclusion of Mr. Swank’s address and convened on Saturday at nine o’clock. Mr. Reeves opened for the state Saturday and made one of his characteristically strong speeches. Mr. Anderson closed for the defense and Mr. Whittington for the state and during their respective addresses there was a lively crashing of timbers and a flying of feathers. Their arguments were of the kind that delights an audience and the court room was packed. It was about noon when Judge West began his instructions to the jury and he was very careful and painstaking in his remarks. The instructions were eminently fair to both sides and were listened to by the jurors with marked attention. At half past twelve he closed and the case was in the hands of twelve good men and true. Before deliberating on the case the jurors had dinner and went into session shortly after one o’clock.
As a matter of fact, the jury reached its decision in the case before 2 o’clock, but owing to the failure to get the lawyers together it was not read until ten minutes to three. A fair sized audience was waiting, having presumed that the jury would not be long in returning and at fifteen minutes to three the prisoner was brought up the back way from the jail, through the alleys, in order to avoid attracting a crowd. He was very pale and manifestly nervous when the jury filed in, but when the verdict was read he smiled all over his face. The foreman of the jury was W. C. Loop, and the verdict simply stated: “We, the jury, find the defendant, Joe Douglas, not guilty as charged.” One of the jury said after the verdict: “We took but two ballots and the first one stood ten to two for acquittal. The next one was unanimous. We felt that we could not bring in any other verdict after hearing the evidence.”
When the verdict was rendered Douglas had but little to say. He is rather thick in the upper story but finally, on the suggestion of some one, arose and shook hands with the jurors, an honor all of them doubtless appreciated. He was turned loose at once but visited the jail to collect some of his effects.


SET FOR TRIAL
 
Source: Crawfordsville Weekly Journal 26 April 1901
Judge West has set state cases for trail as follows:
Alfred Sifrit, horse stealing May 1./
Evan Collier, larceny, May 3.
Joe Douglas, murder, May 6.
Tadie Ring, assault with intent, May 11.
Charles Derrickson, larceny May 13.
Charles Seaman, trespass, May 14.
William Taylor, trespass, May 14.


Source: Crawfordsville Weekly Journal Friday, 28 December 1900

 
Charles Doyle and Frank Parrish, the victims of the shooting affray of last Sunday are both alive yet and in no immediate danger of dying.
“Both men are strong as bullocks” said Dr. Ensminger on Wednesday, “and what would have caused the death of the great majority of men within a few hours has not affected these fellows to the same extent. I regard their rally and improvement as something amazing but, of course, they are not out of the woods yet and a change for the worse may take place any time. I can say positively, however, that neither man will ever recover enough to amount to anything. Parrish has had his face blown off and both eyes are put out. His impression that he saw a flicker of light on Monday was a false one. He is in a horrible condition but may live for some time yet. The swelling has gone down perceptibly since yesterday. Doyle is sitting up because he has to. The position he assumes in lying down is very painful and is all against him. This morning when I called he was making an effort to chew tobacco but was forced to admit that it didn’t taste right. His condition is, of course, very serious and he will always be an invalid. A few days may see changes for the better or worse in both men.”
Both Doyle and Parrish deny many of the assertions of Douglas and have both of them made ante-mortem statements to the coroner. Douglas also made a voluntary statement to Coroner Dennis, in which he set up the same story he told The Journal representative on Monday morning. His wife, the notorious Phronie Douglas, also made a statement in which she said everything possible to protect her husband. She acknowledged her criminal intimacy with Parrish, but said that “If Joe knew about it, he didn’t say anything.” She alleged that Parrish passed their place on December 2d, flourished a revolver, and on one occasion had threatened to throw vitriol in her face. She also alleged that Parrish had threatened to beat her husband whenever the opportunity presented itself.
Tuesday Charley Doyle made the following statement to Coroner Dennis: “Realizing that I may not get well and that this may be my last earthly statement, I state the following and swear that it is the whole truth and nothing but the truth. I first met Frank Parrish on the day of the trouble in the morning at the home of Pete VanLeven. After dinner at the Klondike, Parrish and myself went to the home of Douglas. We had both been drinking and on arrival there we knocked at the front door. Nobody answered and we went to the back door. Frank went to the door and was shot in the face just as he stepped up to the door as near as I can remember. I started to run south and east to go around the house and was shot in the side. I ran over the Wabash Avenue Bridge and fell. I had heard that the Douglas woman was fast but had not heard of her relations with Parrish. I never had any trouble with Douglas and don’t know of any reason why he should have shot me.”
The statement made to the coroner by Parrish was practically the same as he made to The Journal. He said: “I have had trouble with Joe Douglas before. On Halloween I was drunk and went to the Douglas place. I was too drunk to remember anything but that he hit me with a chunk of glass. I never went there again until Sunday. Charles Doyle and I went there then, both of us drunk. I do not remember kicking the door in. I was in the back yard when the shot was fired and cannot say who fired it. I heard someone call, looked around and heard the report. The shot struck me in the face and I could not see anything. I don’t remember hearing the second shot. I have frequently had criminal relations with Douglas’ wife but had not been there since Halloween. I was going to see Mrs. Douglas and was shot before I entered the house. Doyle was with me merely as a friend.”
Doyle’s statement that he was running to the east and south when shot gives color to the theory that he was shot through the window by the second discharge. In that case, however, neither Doyle or Parrish were within fifteen feet of the back door when fired upon, nor were they in the house as Douglas claims.
Douglas is still in jail, of course, and no action will be taken until the outcome of the injuries of his victims can be determined. He is taking things easy and seems to be somewhat proud of his achievement. He affects an indifference to the matter and grins whenever anyone mentions either Parrish or Doyle. He claims that Doyle was his very good friend and that he shot him accidentally, but he seems in no wise put out by the mistake

Back to content